Congressional Powers and Federal Judicial Burdens
نویسنده
چکیده
منابع مشابه
A Path to Purposive Formalism: Interpreting Chapter Iii for Judicial Independence and Impartiality
The interpretation of the separation of federal judicial power derived from Chapter III of the Constitution is as hotly debated as it is fundamentally important. Two key viewpoints have emerged in this debate, formalism and functionalism. A formalist test focusing on defi nitional characteristics governs the permissible powers of federal courts. A functionalist test looking to whether a power i...
متن کاملA Response to beyond Separation: Professor Copeland’s Ambitious Proposal for “integrative” Federalism
Professor Charlton Copeland offers a wide-ranging, ambitious critique of what he characterizes as federalism jurisprudence’s dominant models of “separation” and “allocation” of authority between the respective federal and state spheres. Judicial resolution of federalism questions, he suggests, turns inappropriately and incompletely on the moment of a law’s enactment. This “obsession with the le...
متن کاملThe road ahead for the Affordable Care Act.
199 states had not agreed to, nor could have anticipated, such a drastic change in the Medicaid program. Finally, regarding whether the remaining provisions should survive overruling of one provision, Roberts and the four justices on the Ginsburg opinion voted to sustain the rest of the law, reasoning that Congress would not have wanted the entire statute to fall because of a constitutional pro...
متن کاملThe Politics of Federalism: Self-Interest or Safeguards? Evidence from Congressional Control of State Taxation
We present for the first time in the literature a quantitative analysis of the efficacy of the “political safeguards of federalism.” We also test the popular theory that congressional control of state authority to tax maximizes national welfare. Both analyses rely on a hand-collected data set of every federal statute to date affecting state power to tax. Overall, our data suggest that federal d...
متن کاملHistorical Gloss , Constitutional Conventions , and the Judicial Separation of Powers
Scholars have increasingly focused on the relevance of post-Founding historical practice to discerning the separation of powers between Congress and the Executive Branch, and the Supreme Court has recently endorsed the relevance of such practice. Much less attention has been paid, however, to the relevance of historical practice to discerning the separation of powers between the political branc...
متن کامل